top of page
BLOG POSTS
DISCLAIMER
This blog does not contain legal advice. The legal information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based on such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. Authors are liable for any plagiarism and Lawpoint Uganda won`t have liability towards the same.


High Court clarifies on set-off in contractual claims, circumstantial evidence & constructive knowledge, judicial recusal motions, land transactions defects, & withholding tax on commercial properties
The court emphaised that constructive notice arises only upon proper registration. A registered caveat or instrument gives constructive notice to the world, whether or not a purchaser has actual knowledge. This principle is central in determining the duty of disclosure: if a claim is not yet registered, it may not constitute an encumbrance binding on the seller

Waboga David
2 days ago20 min read


High Court affirms that a purchaser cannot acquire a valid interest in customary family land from a non-owner, especially where due diligence is lacking.
For a gift inter vivos in unregistered land, donor intention and donee acceptance are required. By erroneously finding that the 1st Respondent had authority to sell and that the 2nd Respondent acquired lawful ownership, the trial court deprived the Appellant of her rights in family land.

Waboga David
3 days ago6 min read


High Court affirms that under Section 46(1) Contracts Act Cap 284, where time is of the essence and a party fails to perform, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the promisee.
The Court found that, under Section 46(1) Contracts Act, where time is of the essence and a party fails to perform, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the promisee. Equity will not order specific performance where the claimant is the party in breach (see Nipuni Bhatia v Boutique Shazim Ltd [2015]).

Waboga David
4 days ago6 min read


The High Court affirms that trespass to land may occur through unlawful registration, even in the absence of physical intrusion. The CLR bears no liability for registrations effected in reliance on...
Relying on Justine E.M.N. Lutaya v. Stirling Civil Engineering Co. Ltd, the Court emphasized that trespass occurs where there is unauthorized interference with lawful possession, whether physical or legal. The Plaintiff, as administrator, had legal possession of the land forming part of the estate.

Waboga David
5 days ago5 min read


High Court affirms that property acquired during cohabitation may be shared where contributions are proven, emphasising equitable Distribution to prevent unjust outcomes
While the Respondent bore most of the development burden, the Court held that equity required recognition of the Appellant’s contributions and long-term cohabitation. The Court determined that the Appellant was entitled to a proportionate share of the property to prevent him from leaving “empty-handed,” even if he did not directly fund most of the developments.

Waboga David
6 days ago4 min read


Court of Appeal upholds enforceability of loan agreement containing property transfer clause upon default — affirms binding effect of parties’ free consent and rejects alleged illegality as a defence
It is a well-established legal principle that when a document containing contractual terms is signed, then in the absence of fraud or misrepresentation, the party signing it is bound, and it is wholly immaterial whether he has read the document or not. The appellant acknowledged his indebtedness under the agreement and further conceded that in default, the loan would translate into a sale. He testified that he signed the agreement because he was in need of money, which the re

Waboga David
7 days ago7 min read


Court of Appeal overturns High Court award in cheque reversal dispute, clarifying that cheques are not money – A bank’s obligation to pay arises only when the client has sufficient funds.
The Court clarified that while banks must reverse erroneous credits within a reasonable time, even long delays do not oblige payment if no funds ever existed.

Waboga David
Aug 126 min read


The Court of Appeal has reaffirmed that oral land contracts can be enforced if essential terms and intention are proven by conduct, even without a written agreement.
Although negotiations occurred, evidence showed mutual assent through actions: payments, handing over titles, mutation signing, and participation in subdivision. Oral contracts for land can be enforceable if essential terms are clear and intention is proven (Kobaku Associate v. Owusu, Stanley Bainebabo v. Abaho Tumushabe).

Waboga David
Aug 125 min read


High Court Clarifies Application of Regulation 13 of the Mortgage Regulations and Conditions for 30% Deposit on Interim Injunctions in Mortgage Foreclosure Proceedings
The Court distinguished the decisions in Woodmore Energy Consultancy Ltd & 3 Ors v Guaranty Trust Bank (U) Ltd and Haruna Sentongo v I&M Bank (U) Ltd, clarifying that these cases concern interim stay of execution applications in appellate courts.
These rulings are isolated and contextual and do not alter the established jurisprudence on the application of Regulation 13 to injunctions granted by trial courts.
The appellate court must apply a different approach when dealing wit

Waboga David
Aug 107 min read


Uganda's Constitutional Court reaffirms that Magistrates’ courts cannot grant bail in cases triable only by the High Court; applications must be made directly to the High Court.
The court held that Guidelines 10(2) and 10(3) of the Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2022 are consistent with Articles 2, 23(6)(b) and 23(6)(c) of the Constitution. They lawfully guide magistrates’ courts that only the High Court may grant bail for offences triable exclusively by it.

Waboga David
Aug 106 min read


Supreme Court Overturns Four Murder Convictions, Tightens Standards for Eyewitness Evidence Under Moonlight.
The Court emphasised that it must closely interrogate the credibility of witness testimony where the conditions of observation are questionable. This duty is not merely procedural but goes to the heart of safeguarding against miscarriages of justice. Poor-quality identification evidence, especially in conditions that may impair accuracy, should trigger heightened judicial scrutiny.

Waboga David
Aug 107 min read


High Court Declares Caveats Lodged by Non-Beneficiaries Invalid under Section 123(1) of the Registration of Titles Act and awards damages for Trespass
Under Section 123(1) of the Registration of Titles Act, a person claiming an interest in registered land, such as a beneficiary of a deceased estate, may lodge a caveat to prevent unauthorized dealings with the property until their claim is resolved.

Waboga David
Aug 84 min read


Uganda High Court Rules Executors Cannot Transfer Probate Duties to Third Parties via Power of Attorney
An executrix who has received a grant of probate under the Succession Act, Cap. 268, cannot wholesale delegate her statutory mandate to a third party through a power of attorney. The Court found that such a delegation was a legal nullity, and that the donee (Julius Peter Ochen), having no legal or beneficial interest in the estate, lacked the requisite locus standi to sue on its behalf.

Waboga David
Aug 79 min read


High Court finds the accused not guilty of aggravated defilement because of Insanity.
Despite proving the offence, the Court accepted the defence of insanity based on:
Medical reports from Butabika and Murchison Bay Hospitals confirming schizophrenia and ongoing mental illness treatment. The Court invoked section 49, which allows for a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity where evidence shows the accused lacked criminal responsibility at the time of the offence.

Waboga David
Aug 53 min read


High Court Declines to Grant Certificate of Urgency in Mortgage Foreclosure Dispute Due to Self-Created Delay
A certificate of urgency will not be granted merely because the applicant asserts that the matter is pressing. Courts must independently assess whether there are exceptional and peculiar circumstances justifying deviation from the ordinary court schedule.

Waboga David
Aug 53 min read


Workplace Privacy Breach: Court Upholds Employee’s Dismissal for Unauthorized Recordings
The court upheld the respondent’s decision, finding that the claimant had indeed infringed upon the privacy rights of other employees. His conduct constituted a valid reason for dismissal. Furthermore, the court held that the claimant failed to demonstrate that the information he shared with his supervisor was privileged or protected from disclosure by the employer. As such, the court declined to declare that the claimant’s right to privacy had been violated.

Waboga David
Aug 41 min read


Uganda’s High Court reinforces key mortgage law principles—rejecting mental illness as a defence to default and affirming the purchaser’s right to vacant possession after foreclosure.
The Court emphasised that once a contract is valid, it creates reciprocal rights and obligations between the parties to it. I think it is the law that when a document containing contractual terms is signed, then in absence of fraud or misrepresentation the party signing it is bound by its terms. — quoting William Kasozi v DFCU Bank Ltd, HCCS No. 1326 of 2000.

Waboga David
Aug 316 min read


U.S. Federal Court Condemns Fabricated AI-Generated Citations in Motion to Dismiss Briefs
The Court emphasized that use of generative AI does not absolve attorneys of their ethical and professional obligations, citing violations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) and Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3.

Waboga David
Aug 32 min read


The High Court sets aside the UGX 20 million awarded as instruction fees, holding that the taxing master misclassified the suit, emphasising that costs are compensatory, not punitive.
The taxing master failed to justify the UGX 20 million award, and such an amount was excessive, punitive, and unsupported by the factual or legal complexity of the matter.

Waboga David
Aug 15 min read


Uganda Court of Appeal reaffirms that a person without a legal interest in land cannot create a valid mortgage under Section 116 of the RTA — Orders refund to misled purchaser on equitable grounds
The Court affirmed that “A mortgage under Section 116 of the Registration of Titles Act is void ab initio where the mortgagor did not have registered title at the time of execution.”

Waboga David
Aug 17 min read


Court of Appeal Affirms That Express Terms in Contracts—Especially Regarding Quantity—Are Enforceable; a Party Cannot Demand Full Payment Under a Contract When They Have Only Partially Performed.
Where a party fails to perform their obligations in full, they cannot insist on full performance from the other party. The Court found that the respondent had delivered only 6.908 acres, less than half of the agreed 15 acres. As such, he was not entitled to the full purchase price.

Waboga David
Jul 317 min read


High Court Convicts Man for Rape in Kabale, reinforcing that rape prosecutions must be grounded in both testimonial and medical evidence, with the prosecution bearing the full evidentiary burden.
The Court reaffirmed the principles governing the standard of proof in criminal trials, drawing from Miller v Minister of Pensions (1947) and Woolmington v DPP (1935).
Identification evidence, especially under difficult conditions, must meet stringent tests laid out in Bogere Moses v Uganda. Medical evidence and credible, consistent testimony were central to securing a conviction for rape under Sections 110 and 111 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 120.

Waboga David
Jul 304 min read


High Court has clarified that the FIA does not prohibit persons in Uganda from borrowing from foreign entities, so long as those entities are not operating deposit-taking or regulated “financial ...
The Court referenced a 2020 Bank of Uganda statement, confirming that foreign lenders not accepting deposits from the Ugandan public are not regulated under the FIA. These foreign lenders operate under the laws of their home countries and international contractual principles—not the Ugandan FIA. Therefore, the Court held that there is no law in Uganda forbidding persons from borrowing from entities or institutions outside Uganda, and that such a restriction would be unreasona

Waboga David
Jul 2918 min read


High Court affirms that in an application to manage the estate of a person with mental illness, a spouse is considered a qualified relative to be appointed as a personal representative of the estate
a spouse is a qualified relative under Section 61(1) of the Act, and may be appointed as a personal representative of a person judicially declared to have mental illness. This is especially pertinent in situations where no prior arrangements—such as a power of attorney—have been made.

Waboga David
Jul 255 min read
Follow us:
bottom of page