top of page
BLOG POSTS
DISCLAIMER
This blog does not contain legal advice. The legal information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based on such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. Authors are liable for any plagiarism and Lawpoint Uganda won`t have liability towards the same.


High Court clarifies on set-off in contractual claims, circumstantial evidence & constructive knowledge, judicial recusal motions, land transactions defects, & withholding tax on commercial properties
The court emphaised that constructive notice arises only upon proper registration. A registered caveat or instrument gives constructive notice to the world, whether or not a purchaser has actual knowledge. This principle is central in determining the duty of disclosure: if a claim is not yet registered, it may not constitute an encumbrance binding on the seller

Waboga David
2 days ago20 min read


High Court affirms that under Section 46(1) Contracts Act Cap 284, where time is of the essence and a party fails to perform, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the promisee.
The Court found that, under Section 46(1) Contracts Act, where time is of the essence and a party fails to perform, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the promisee. Equity will not order specific performance where the claimant is the party in breach (see Nipuni Bhatia v Boutique Shazim Ltd [2015]).

Waboga David
4 days ago6 min read


Court of Appeal overturns High Court award in cheque reversal dispute, clarifying that cheques are not money – A bank’s obligation to pay arises only when the client has sufficient funds.
The Court clarified that while banks must reverse erroneous credits within a reasonable time, even long delays do not oblige payment if no funds ever existed.

Waboga David
Aug 126 min read


High Court Clarifies Application of Regulation 13 of the Mortgage Regulations and Conditions for 30% Deposit on Interim Injunctions in Mortgage Foreclosure Proceedings
The Court distinguished the decisions in Woodmore Energy Consultancy Ltd & 3 Ors v Guaranty Trust Bank (U) Ltd and Haruna Sentongo v I&M Bank (U) Ltd, clarifying that these cases concern interim stay of execution applications in appellate courts.
These rulings are isolated and contextual and do not alter the established jurisprudence on the application of Regulation 13 to injunctions granted by trial courts.
The appellate court must apply a different approach when dealing wit

Waboga David
Aug 107 min read


Uganda’s High Court reinforces key mortgage law principles—rejecting mental illness as a defence to default and affirming the purchaser’s right to vacant possession after foreclosure.
The Court emphasised that once a contract is valid, it creates reciprocal rights and obligations between the parties to it. I think it is the law that when a document containing contractual terms is signed, then in absence of fraud or misrepresentation the party signing it is bound by its terms. — quoting William Kasozi v DFCU Bank Ltd, HCCS No. 1326 of 2000.

Waboga David
Aug 316 min read


Uganda Court of Appeal reaffirms that a person without a legal interest in land cannot create a valid mortgage under Section 116 of the RTA — Orders refund to misled purchaser on equitable grounds
The Court affirmed that “A mortgage under Section 116 of the Registration of Titles Act is void ab initio where the mortgagor did not have registered title at the time of execution.”

Waboga David
Aug 17 min read


High Court has clarified that the FIA does not prohibit persons in Uganda from borrowing from foreign entities, so long as those entities are not operating deposit-taking or regulated “financial ...
The Court referenced a 2020 Bank of Uganda statement, confirming that foreign lenders not accepting deposits from the Ugandan public are not regulated under the FIA. These foreign lenders operate under the laws of their home countries and international contractual principles—not the Ugandan FIA. Therefore, the Court held that there is no law in Uganda forbidding persons from borrowing from entities or institutions outside Uganda, and that such a restriction would be unreasona

Waboga David
Jul 2918 min read


High Court affirms that where shareholders pass away, courts may lawfully empower surviving members to convene meetings and carry out corporate actions to preserve the business.
The High Court affirmed that Once shareholders of a company pass away, it is reasonable for the court to allow the surviving member and/or officer to conduct the affairs of the company as they deem fit to further the company’s objectives

Waboga David
Jul 23 min read


High Court Declares Mortgage Void: Loan Granted to Deceased Borrower Invalidates Sale and Caveat on Company Land
Lending institutions must ensure that a company resolution is in place before accepting company property as loan security. In its absence, such transactions risk being invalidated for lack of proper authorization under company law. Moreover, The court reaffirmed the duty of banks and financial institutions to conduct thorough due diligence, especially when accepting corporate property as collateral. Failure to verify corporate approvals or the identity of borrowers may lead t

Waboga David
Jun 299 min read


High Court reaffirms that money lending contracts must comply with the Tier 4 Act; courts will not enforce illegal lending arrangements, even where funds have been advanced.
The High Court found that the loan agreement for UGX 2,550,000/= (dated 17th September 2019) lacked the signatures of both the lender and a third-party witness, contravening Section 84(1) of the Tier 4 Microfinance Institutions and Money Lenders Act.

Waboga David
Jun 273 min read


High Court Draws the Line on Predatory Lending, Inviting Exemplary Damages: Title Transfer, Notice to Guarantors, and the Rule of Law in the Security Interest in Movable Property Act, Cap 293
The court found that the sale was not fraudulent nor conducted without valuation, but the transfer was illegal, and the sale was conducted in breach of the guarantee contract due to failure to notify the Plaintiff.

Waboga David
Jun 2612 min read


Revisiting the Doctrine of Guarantorship in a Contract: A Comparative Look at Mian Aqueel & Anor v Exim Bank (U) Ltd and Ecobank Uganda Ltd v King James Comprehensive School Ltd & Others
A guarantee establishes a tripartite legal relationship involving the creditor, the principal debtor, and the guarantor. Under this arrangement, the guarantor undertakes a secondary obligation to satisfy the debt or obligation if the principal debtor defaults. This secondary liability only becomes enforceable upon the failure of the principal debtor to fulfil their primary obligation.

Lawpointuganda
Jun 810 min read


Supreme Court Clarifies That Mortgages Are Governed by Contractual Terms; Regulation 13 of the Mortgage Regulations No. 2 of 2012 Complements Rather Than Overrides That Relationship.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Haruna Sentongo v I & M Bank (U) Limited brings a shift in the interpretation of Regulation 13 of the Mortgage Regulations 2012. While the Constitutional Court previously upheld the provision as constitutionally sound in Ferdsult Engineering Services Ltd v Attorney General, the Supreme Court has now injected a necessary nuance, emphasizing that rigid application of the 30% repayment requirement must not obstruct access to justice or undermine t

Sylivia Nandawula
May 175 min read


High Court Condemns MTN’s Unilateral Actions for Breaching Contractual Obligations, Engaging in Unfair Competition, and Wrongfully Converting Proprietary Subscriber Data Belonging to VAS Garage Ltd.
Statutory bodies such as UCC must act strictly within their enabling legislation—powers to award monetary compensation must be clearly conferred.

Sylivia Nandawula
Apr 225 min read


High Court Clarifies Procedural and Substantive Requirements in Appeals from Magistrates’ Courts
Financial transfers within a romantic or cohabiting relationship are not automatically recoverable unless supported by evidence of contractu

Waboga David
Apr 92 min read


HIGH COURT CLARIFIES THE PRINCIPLES ON THE STAY OF EXECUTION IN MONETARY JUDGMENTS — UNDER ORDER 43 Rule 4(3) OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES.
Courts are inclined to maintain the balance between preserving the appellant’s right of appeal and protecting the respondent’s entitlement t

Waboga David
Apr 55 min read


A DEBTOR MUST MAINTAIN COMMUNICATION WITH THE CREDITOR, PARTICULARLY IN CASES OF FINANCIAL DIFFICULTY, HIGH COURT REAFFIRMS
When a person takes goods or services from another person on credit, it is imperative to keep the communication channels open.

Waboga David
Apr 23 min read


THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS UPHELD THE SUPERIORITY OF MORTGAGE RIGHTS, REINFORCING THAT A VALIDLY REGISTERED SECURITY INTEREST PREVAILS OVER SUBSEQUENT OWNERSHIP CLAIMS.
The Court of Appeal has reinforced the principle that borrowers cannot evade financial obligations through corporate misrepresentation

Sylivia Nandawula
Mar 295 min read


HIGH COURT HAS CLARIFIED THAT TAXATION OF INSTRUCTION FEES SHOULD BE BASED ON THE PLEADINGS, JUDGMENTS, OR SETTLEMENTS AND, WHERE NOT ASCERTAINABLE, SHOULD RELY ON PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL COST ASSESSMENT.
The value of the subject matter should be determined from pleadings, judgment, or settlement, but where not ascertainable, discretion must b

Lawpointuganda
Mar 175 min read


THE PROCUREMENT APPEALS TRIBUNAL HAS AFFIRMED THAT THE NON-SUBMISSION OF AN ELIGIBILITY DOCUMENT IS NOT A FATAL FLAW, AS THE P.D.E IS OBLIGATED TO REQUEST ITS SUBMISSION THROUGH CLARIFICATION.
No other evaluation criteria other than that stated in the bidding document can be considered by the evaluation committee during the evaluat

Rebecca Mutesi
Mar 154 min read


THE SUPREME COURT HAS REAFFIRMED THAT A PERSON CONTRACTING ON BEHALF OF A NON-EXISTENT COMPANY BEARS PERSONAL LIABILITY.
Under Section 33(1)(a) of the Companies Act, a contract is validly executed if signed by an authorized company representative.

Lawpointuganda
Mar 88 min read


HIGH COURT REAFFIRMS PRINCIPLES OF FAIRNESS AND TRANSPARENCY IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PROCESSES—DISQUALIFICATIONS MUST BE JUSTIFIED AND WELL-INVESTIGATED
Procuring entities must ensure that any disqualification or adverse action against a bidder is based on proper investigations and justifiabl

Lawpointuganda
Mar 42 min read


High Court Clarifies That Job Loss of a Co-Borrower Does Not Frustrate a Salary Loan Contract.
Once a loan offer is accepted by the borrower and communicated to the lender, it becomes legally binding. The lender cannot unilaterally

Waboga David
Feb 192 min read


CASE BRIEF OF HERITAGE OIL AND GAS LTD V UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY CIVIL APPEAL NO.14 OF 2011
Tax Appeals Tribunal cannot refer disputes before it for arbitration even if the parties had an already existing agreement that permits it

Mbabazi Cindy Patricia
Jan 23 min read
Follow us:
bottom of page